dis is da cliffhangerr plz,,

okay ladies and (mostly) genlemen this is tha moment you have all been waiting for to happen, the moment i reveal what i said to MIKHUl, the student of the university of brown who has FLAGRANTLY PLAGIERIZED MY WORK AND COPIED IT AND PASSED IT OFF AS HIS OWN (aka PLAIGIARISM) here is what i said to him, this is it:

dear mikhul,

i am writing dis PLEASE to you because you have been plaigiarizing my work which i think is wrong, so please stop it now/stop it just

b/c i really dont want u 2 do it PLZ so,
thx for u/r coup operation it really helped me overthrow y/r plaigiarism (that's a joke known as a pun in case u dont do not go to Ford's Ocks in the Youniversidi of OxFord University, of OxFord, (whih will henceforth be known as Ford's Ox for copyright reasons,,

oh also here is my self-review, of another blog post i wrote, which is a review of blog posts i wrote myself in the past,

in my last post i discussed the story of Bones and did a advanced literary analysis of the post-modern concepts in the story of bones, which can be found here, http://thestoryofbones.tumblr.com/, thats the story, or the analysese which is here, http://therealytui.blogspot.com/2010/03/hey-guys.html,

okay so here is the self-review of this post,

i think overall it's pretty good, probably not my best work but still better than pretty much every analysis of the Story of Bones.tumbler, but also probably pretty much the best postmodern literary analysis of everything, though a co-league at the college of Ox Ford pointed out to me that i failed to elebarorate on the posttextual subnihilistic socialistic (non-Marxist of course) realism contextualized in, yeah, most of it, even though i obviously did but w/e,
basically my post was really good and can't be improved and that is my self reivew,

hey guys,

today we're going to be talking about a story I found on line, it's called the Story of Bones, it can be found here:






http://thestoryofbones.tumblr.com/



^^
there,
I'm going to talk tabout it now but i am going to use very high level postmodern lanbguage because I got to OxFord, so pleas if y/r stupid or cannot see well (blindness, etc,, then dont even bother,:

The predominant conception in this wrk is the distinction between existentialist objectivism and postindustrial nihilism,m, which obviously i don't need to explain or go/into detail about unless your retarded, so im going to focus on something only someone of my caliber of intellect can comprehend,

a more subtle but pwrful theme in the story of Bones is the the meaninglessness of precapitalist class. The primary theme of the works of this works is not discourse, but postdiscours of course, his analysis of this is also contextualized in the societal realism he portrays through the use of Sartreist subexistentialist society in which the main chateracter, Harry, serves as a model of textual objectivism as a self-falsifying whol, i/e Harry's violent masturbation as a source of pride/revenge, or the neocultural deconstructivist postdialectic sub-Marxist postmodern precapitalist contextualism, (i/e subcapitalist ennui,, or being consumed by this, Ex) if one were to distinguish between posttextual semioticist theory and a mythopoetical totality



the story of Bones concludes w/ a ultimatum the author presupposes upon the contextualistzed realism of the work, his call for ppl to choose between the textual paradigm of reality and patriarchialist materialism, with an obvious preference to one, if u dont know which i feel bad for/u

also mikhul sent me this message trying to reason with me:

"plz i am such a fag and yr so talented plz let me plagirarze some more swell this is wasw what i said to him:

ya ya gotta wait till next blog post sry