my Second self-review

okay guys since I do self-reviews (for those of you who are new to the Real (for those of you who are new to the Real Ytui@bloggerpost.org “”the Real,,/ is an abbreviated shortening of “The Real Ytui™”, it is copyright©, also please look at my Introductory post so I no Longer have to post these things about in the Future about which has already been stated (in the Past, which are reviews that I write of things that I posted my Self, in the Past,

this Review will be of probably my best Post, on this site so far (This is only a Blog. For my more Scholarly,, work plz,

plz, oh no not dis again plz, U must B saying, but it is also what I am saying PLZ,

PLZ DIS IZ ME PLZ, DIS IZ ME DIS PLZ, PLZ, dis, dis iz, plz,

sorry about that Guys,

you know,, visit my site where you can see some of my Papers from Middle School and my Freshman year of high school (you can tell because they are mostly postmodern and not post-postmodern,) are can be Viewed here (embed)

{html= 0,0, 1,011 www.elsewhere.org/pomo they so there are not very Good,

now but some of you might be saying, kris../, plz, U sed in an earlier blogspot that you said that you abandoned postmodernism for post-postmodernism at age 6, (Please, this is me,, but what they don’t realize is that, since, I was so a head of my time at this Age, that I still had to work within a postmodern Framework since post-postmodernism was not acknowledged by any Professional Educators, so that is why my scholarly papers are postmodern, that are available, of course I wrote others (not on discourse but post-discourse of course (not to be, of course,, confused with post discourse, which is the discourse of blog posts (though I generally work with post post-discourse, since this is a blog post, (you can obviuosy tell becuase youa re on bloggerpost.postnet.com/user=?space\backslashforward.com/therealytui/?=video-sourcecode/mfnBuj_80-Hj6) but they were destroyed in a Fire, only my school ones are Available, as I was saying this is only A blog, so plz, dis iz my blog plz, so here is a self-Review of a post in the Past,

it is entitled “Well,” it is from April 12, 2010, and is available on this Blog if you look at though the Blog,

any I think my empirical Evidence is mostly sufficient though I should add to the list,

the 75th district of West Virgina, the 1st, 2nd, and 13th districts of New Camden, and post-new Georgia, as well as districts 8 and district 9 in the Southern Florida states, the 17th district of Adensville, Carolina,

and I also think the post-postmodern post analysis of post-discourse in the post is very good, though i foolishly forget to mention the subtextual implications of a post-capitalists Continental sexual indentity of contextualized realism in Class context, but I digest, anyway it was good seeing you Guys,

postcultural desituationism and subconceptual theory

Inception (2010), is a recent Film which many postmodernists, have not been pleased with plz,

plz, plz dis iz me plz, they Criticize Modernists b/c they Are too , to be Polite, “””myopic” to realize that kris../ Nolan™ is in Fact a post-postmodernist, here’s why:

many people (say that inception wasn’t good b/c of, Logical Inconsistencies, and such as the laws of Physics and the laws of Dreaming, but plz,

plz:

Dumbasses say: Welp, Inception (2010)© was logically incoherent, the film’s substructural Dream worlds are inconsistent within the Larger Superstructural marxist paradigms within the films, such as the filmmakers conception’s of existential realism with regard to, plz,

BUT DUMBASSES: the inconsistencies only exist insofar as Derrida could throw, that is to say: only insofar as the preconceptual sylogisms represent a Banayavenian perspective on posttextual exosomatic realism, ie, it is not known b/c statistics are unavailable, but this again goes on to show that while it is true that, in order to do so, it is necessary to acknowledge the meaninglessness of postmarxist inconsistencies due to the fact that inception (the concept in the film, not to be confused with the title itself (Inception™ (2010) exists only insofar as consciousness can be reconciled within itself

so the film itself is coherent, Dumbasses, plz,

the only criticism I have of the film that while it acknowledges a post-postmodern conception of subcapitalist sartreist emotivism (in regard to, of course, a quasi-realist prescriptivistic notion of metaontology, postdialectic dialogue (in regard to post-postdiscourse of course,) is metalogically cogent, plz,

plz (please, this is me. Please!

only insofar as semantic neocultural rationalism acknowledges postsituationist theories of paradigmatic sexual identity, which is to say, in regard to deappropriation, deconstructivism, and dedestructivism, plz,

PLZ DIS IZ ME PLZ, anyway for those of you interes...(Read more) [click to expand]

hi Guys,

well,, me and my Professors were talking about the most recent memetic phenomana: Jessi Slaughter :recently, and realized, though that she may be perceived to the average persen, to be, perhaps, of the Condition of not unlike the Mentally Impaired or the sub-optimal Intelligence, Level, that those her in her video to her so-called “haters”, that she possesses a perhaps above Average understanding of contemporary postmodern critical Theory, but I do not think it would be untrue to suggest that it is not unlike the Masses to be not ahead of their time, so they are still Stuck in Postmodernity when the World is in fact in post-Postmodernity, and Jessi is ahead of her time because she is so postmodern that she is a somewhat post-Postmodern, but unfortunately, not post-Postmodern enough, okay, here we go,

here is the , plz, the posting of the post,

the poasttoad of the poasttoads,

the poasting of the post of poasttoad of the poast/post-Postmodern Critical Analysis of the Jessi Slaughter’s Formal Address to Haters,

okay,

here is the video:

html//

0=embed{pm/video ((multimedia,

plz, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jOmYq3lh_E,,,,..

0=true} embed lplz,

plz dis iz C+++ plz,

okay,

Jesse’s, here is her First Main Assertion:

“y’r just jelouse b/c I’m perfect and y’r not”

jesse here is typical Postmodern: she acknowledges the meaninglessness of pre-Postmodern aspirations to Perfection, which she makes implicit in implying that, in her implications that it is why they are jealous, because they are stuck in Modernity (she thinks he is in postmodernity, and thus, Enlightened (while we know that we are in fact in post-Postmodernity and, thus to be Polite, “””Highly enlightened”,” to,

however, She falls one poast, one toad, one poasttoad poastertoadster short of post-Postmodern, (which is not bad, compared to your average 11 year old (she later Says in the video, that, she is in fact, later in the video she says that she is not 9, but 11, (which is how I know her age, (also, I was 6 when I abandonded postmodernism for post-post pavilion, because she herself is makes the assertion that she is Perfect in their eyes, i.e., that perfection is subjective, but as a post-Postmodernist I know that perfection is not subjective; in fact, it is neither subjective nor objective: it is, post-Postmodernism

Jesse’s Second, although Subtle, postmodern Assertion may be misconstrued as a Grammatological Error, in making the statement that:

“I would just shut your mouths before you make a fool of yourself”

the Modern Intellectual would say: this statement is grammatically erroneous, it would be correct to say “before you make a fool or yourselves” instead of “yourself”, or better yet to replace “mouths” with “mouth” since you, in the First place, primarily assume the role of the first person, in suggesting that you are a person, and therefore you cannot become multiply people, so a better correctly statement would be “I would just shut your mouth [if I were you] before you make a fool of yourself”

But, then the more, the postmodern intellectual, would be quick to retort: you display a profound ignorance of postmodern cosmology, since, in fact, the speaker was making implicit the implication that Consciousness transcends our understanding of Individuality, and a sense of Oneness is apparent, not in a “spiritual” or “religious” manner speaking, so to speak, but that Individuality, Separation, and Empathy,;;;;/// -is an illusion. in fact: it is -this, that, in fact, we are to be supposed to be a single entity, and therefore we only understand other things because we in Fact, are that thing, and therefore, the Writer in this Instance is merely being herself, and, with foresight, informing herself of the Dangers of not shutting her Own mouth, (i.e., physicalism, materialism, but obviously:

the post-postmodern intellectual, obviously, sees the faults, of the Earlier two, simply it is that nothing is reducible down to a One, in that, the duality of Oneness is implicit in any post-Postmodern work, and also postmodernists pay clearly no attention to interpolated yet exosomati subcultural predialectic intrinsically postcapitalist Foucaultist Sartreist Marxian Foucaltist Derridaist dematerialism, plz,

Perhaps the only Sine of Profundity, or rather, Example, would be of which she suggests that the, to make the assertion that,--perhaps--to the “haters” to “suck [her] nonexistent penis”,

it is here that her true understand of post-Postmodernity, has come to light, though has no “truthful” understanding, she has a partial, truthfully understanding of the concept of existence, in that, she does not presuppose a self-justifying reality, but instead promotes the use of a posttextual objectivist constructivism, i.e, insomuch as inferring or, in other words, denoting a cultural paradox, becomes apparent in her implicit dismantling of Marxian capitalist paradigms,

phew, that is More than I usually post on this blog, for my Scholarly papers please visit, http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/, embed, though these are my very old ones from middle school, I’ll have my high school and university papers up Later,

DIS IZ ME PLZ, DIS IZ THE POAST PLZ,

the poastertoadster is here, it here and Iam excited about its , it is here plz finally I will discuss what I said: that I am,, soemthing which many people do not believe to be Me, plz,

plz,z,pl,

pz,z,zplz,, (dis Iz me plz,,,,..,,,,,,.............

that I am

infact,

a sea krit agent.

For the league Of Nonsense.tumrblr,, html://leagueofnonsense.tumblr.com,

Welp,,. there are a Few things I hereto and whetherfore must Discuss, consequentially .

Firstly, the assertion that b/c I am a Sea Krit LON Agent, that my Blog here is Necessarily False, or Not True,

but this Assertion presupposes the truth-aptness of Itself, (ie, presupposes that the Stataement is cognitively Meaningful,..

how Ever, this is a palpably and de-Monsterable flase Claim, for two main purposes:

Firstly, the assertion that b/c I am a Sea Krit LON Agent, that my Blog here is Necessarily False, or Not True, fails to account for a subtextualist Realist form of Derridan/post-postMarxist supposition of supporting implications inasmuch and insofar as an assertion can support its own consuqeuntial and prerequisite truths, as well as its Logical Corrolaries, which Ultimately, of course, collapses in on itself based on any valid post-premodernist paradigm of cognitively functional semantic discourse,

How ever, this Leads me to my Second reason,::

as I remarked in an earlier Blog Post, the issue at hand of course is not discourse but post-Discourse of course, so both of my Reasons, independent of themselves, are enough to Dismantle this Claim, so if you wish you prove me False, (LOL then you would have to disprove both, which is inpossible

another claim here is, that Yes, I am kris,,/ from the League of Nonsense and from the Story of Bones, which I take Credit™ for, b/c they are both magnifficient exemplary examples of good Literature, ie, (of the Fiction Genren, of the non-Fiction of which this better serves to prelude as such, (inasmuch as a posttextualist sub-Marxian post-evolutionary paradigmatic sophistian homeosempatic seperable contextualized semantic functionalist fortismatic Essentialist posttextualist sub-Marxian post-evolutionary paradigmatic Essentialist posttextualist sub-Post-postmodern ,

,,

.,

plz, dis iz me plz,

My Blog, it’s mine,

but I hope you have gained insite experience as to how to properly exert and exosematic schematic exoschematic exissentialist presupposition of Truth, and lastly,,

,,

,

Dis iz Me, signing off plz, Plz,

ya

this is Me/you ""plz

recently a friend of Mine is going to join me here at Ock’s Place, in here is going to come to Ford’s Ox to Help me with re-Search here in postmodern Linguistics , his name is:

:

,,

will be revealed/unvealed next Poast , however, I have been asked some questions, about Philosophy Here on my Blog, in a massage over blogpost.com, he asked me abou some philosophy stuff, also Other people asked me to because alot of people are interesting in Me, but I will post his message, it is from User: CoolDude55, :”

Aristotletteinistic Ethicism??? what Was the case Like??

“”

this is Of course, referring to a debate i did in a Public Forum here at Oc’s Elot’s Place in the University of Colombia Medical Students here in Weekapaug, London, it is a Place right down the corridor from OxFord , which is where I go to school ((not Columbia!!!!

anyway my case , maybe this poastertoadster didn’t realize, but, was my case ironic, I ran a case supporting Aristolteolten Ehtics, but i did it Ironically, and everyone from Ox Ford understood that i was being Sarcastic b/c obviously aristoadle, in his writings, obviously never took into account the Posttextual/sub-Marxian paradigm of social Realism in the context of compatibilist pre-Sartreist (ie, Derrida) obviously, everyone in Ox’s ,, the Place in Oxford , knows this, but Columbina people obviously didn’t know it, i Mean

anyway, Arstiodalt additionally did not acknowledge Butlerian foundationalist contigency when discussing Butler, which he did in his book, I am Aritstole , in which he discussing deconstructionalisticism, and Also Ethicisim, but I digest//

next Poasta, will I be in a case of a sphere or maybe not????