hi Guys,

well,, me and my Professors were talking about the most recent memetic phenomana: Jessi Slaughter :recently, and realized, though that she may be perceived to the average persen, to be, perhaps, of the Condition of not unlike the Mentally Impaired or the sub-optimal Intelligence, Level, that those her in her video to her so-called “haters”, that she possesses a perhaps above Average understanding of contemporary postmodern critical Theory, but I do not think it would be untrue to suggest that it is not unlike the Masses to be not ahead of their time, so they are still Stuck in Postmodernity when the World is in fact in post-Postmodernity, and Jessi is ahead of her time because she is so postmodern that she is a somewhat post-Postmodern, but unfortunately, not post-Postmodern enough, okay, here we go,

here is the , plz, the posting of the post,

the poasttoad of the poasttoads,

the poasting of the post of poasttoad of the poast/post-Postmodern Critical Analysis of the Jessi Slaughter’s Formal Address to Haters,

okay,

here is the video:

html//

0=embed{pm/video ((multimedia,

plz, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jOmYq3lh_E,,,,..

0=true} embed lplz,

plz dis iz C+++ plz,

okay,

Jesse’s, here is her First Main Assertion:

“y’r just jelouse b/c I’m perfect and y’r not”

jesse here is typical Postmodern: she acknowledges the meaninglessness of pre-Postmodern aspirations to Perfection, which she makes implicit in implying that, in her implications that it is why they are jealous, because they are stuck in Modernity (she thinks he is in postmodernity, and thus, Enlightened (while we know that we are in fact in post-Postmodernity and, thus to be Polite, “””Highly enlightened”,” to,

however, She falls one poast, one toad, one poasttoad poastertoadster short of post-Postmodern, (which is not bad, compared to your average 11 year old (she later Says in the video, that, she is in fact, later in the video she says that she is not 9, but 11, (which is how I know her age, (also, I was 6 when I abandonded postmodernism for post-post pavilion, because she herself is makes the assertion that she is Perfect in their eyes, i.e., that perfection is subjective, but as a post-Postmodernist I know that perfection is not subjective; in fact, it is neither subjective nor objective: it is, post-Postmodernism

Jesse’s Second, although Subtle, postmodern Assertion may be misconstrued as a Grammatological Error, in making the statement that:

“I would just shut your mouths before you make a fool of yourself”

the Modern Intellectual would say: this statement is grammatically erroneous, it would be correct to say “before you make a fool or yourselves” instead of “yourself”, or better yet to replace “mouths” with “mouth” since you, in the First place, primarily assume the role of the first person, in suggesting that you are a person, and therefore you cannot become multiply people, so a better correctly statement would be “I would just shut your mouth [if I were you] before you make a fool of yourself”

But, then the more, the postmodern intellectual, would be quick to retort: you display a profound ignorance of postmodern cosmology, since, in fact, the speaker was making implicit the implication that Consciousness transcends our understanding of Individuality, and a sense of Oneness is apparent, not in a “spiritual” or “religious” manner speaking, so to speak, but that Individuality, Separation, and Empathy,;;;;/// -is an illusion. in fact: it is -this, that, in fact, we are to be supposed to be a single entity, and therefore we only understand other things because we in Fact, are that thing, and therefore, the Writer in this Instance is merely being herself, and, with foresight, informing herself of the Dangers of not shutting her Own mouth, (i.e., physicalism, materialism, but obviously:

the post-postmodern intellectual, obviously, sees the faults, of the Earlier two, simply it is that nothing is reducible down to a One, in that, the duality of Oneness is implicit in any post-Postmodern work, and also postmodernists pay clearly no attention to interpolated yet exosomati subcultural predialectic intrinsically postcapitalist Foucaultist Sartreist Marxian Foucaltist Derridaist dematerialism, plz,

Perhaps the only Sine of Profundity, or rather, Example, would be of which she suggests that the, to make the assertion that,--perhaps--to the “haters” to “suck [her] nonexistent penis”,

it is here that her true understand of post-Postmodernity, has come to light, though has no “truthful” understanding, she has a partial, truthfully understanding of the concept of existence, in that, she does not presuppose a self-justifying reality, but instead promotes the use of a posttextual objectivist constructivism, i.e, insomuch as inferring or, in other words, denoting a cultural paradox, becomes apparent in her implicit dismantling of Marxian capitalist paradigms,

phew, that is More than I usually post on this blog, for my Scholarly papers please visit, http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/, embed, though these are my very old ones from middle school, I’ll have my high school and university papers up Later,