hey guys,

today we're going to be talking about a story I found on line, it's called the Story of Bones, it can be found here:






http://thestoryofbones.tumblr.com/



^^
there,
I'm going to talk tabout it now but i am going to use very high level postmodern lanbguage because I got to OxFord, so pleas if y/r stupid or cannot see well (blindness, etc,, then dont even bother,:

The predominant conception in this wrk is the distinction between existentialist objectivism and postindustrial nihilism,m, which obviously i don't need to explain or go/into detail about unless your retarded, so im going to focus on something only someone of my caliber of intellect can comprehend,

a more subtle but pwrful theme in the story of Bones is the the meaninglessness of precapitalist class. The primary theme of the works of this works is not discourse, but postdiscours of course, his analysis of this is also contextualized in the societal realism he portrays through the use of Sartreist subexistentialist society in which the main chateracter, Harry, serves as a model of textual objectivism as a self-falsifying whol, i/e Harry's violent masturbation as a source of pride/revenge, or the neocultural deconstructivist postdialectic sub-Marxist postmodern precapitalist contextualism, (i/e subcapitalist ennui,, or being consumed by this, Ex) if one were to distinguish between posttextual semioticist theory and a mythopoetical totality



the story of Bones concludes w/ a ultimatum the author presupposes upon the contextualistzed realism of the work, his call for ppl to choose between the textual paradigm of reality and patriarchialist materialism, with an obvious preference to one, if u dont know which i feel bad for/u

also mikhul sent me this message trying to reason with me:

"plz i am such a fag and yr so talented plz let me plagirarze some more swell this is wasw what i said to him:

ya ya gotta wait till next blog post sry