Well,

okay ock’s ford, the OxFord ,

ya community,

today i will dispel myths about demographics in the united states plz,

okay here is the standard argument:

I, [insert Name Here,)) find it shocking that the 3^rd district of florida and the,,

7^th district of maine show that the correlation between demographics and democratics is not only indifferentiated by the absense of a tautological extreme, but shows that the varied demographics are the root Cause of this democratics,

therefore racial people are democratics,

and white people are,, to be “”polite’’’’, silly and gay

okay there are several things wrong with this argument,,

firstly the person clearly dismisses the majority of the data,

for instance the 3^rd district of montana, the 63^rd district of montanta, the 63^rd district of montana, the 11^th district of AutoKansas, the 17^th district of kansas, the 2^nd threw 86^th districts of california and maine, also the 6^th district of new Chersea, show that the person dismisses the majority of the data which suggests the opposite of the suggester’s suggestion,

namely the I,e. correlation between the causal link between the correlation of circular argumentation and the redundancy of a nominal chain,

but more Import tannly that than that is this is that the varied demographics are not the cause of the discourse of the democratics but the postdiscourse of course of the anti-democratics,

I,e.e namely the non-democratics,

to be polite i Think THIS assertion is, “To Be polite,,’’’ very,”to be polite,,”””””